site logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Posts
  • Get Involved
Homepage > Budget > Defunding the ARC punishes Pulaski
March 23, 2017  |  By Mike Reis In Budget, Economy, Taxes

Defunding the ARC punishes Pulaski

Photo by Hung LuiPhoto by Hung Lui

68.1% of Pulaski County voters voted for Trump, but, according to the editorial staff of the Roanoke Times, when we look at his recently shared budget proposal, 45 has “an odd way of returning the favor.”

The Roanoke Times staff did a good job covering this betrayal and what it could mean for southwest Virginia more broadly with the elimination of programs like the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) which has spent millions to retrain coal miners and fund efforts to shift the local economy to focus on technology and security. In the past four decades the ARC has funded $4 billion dollars of programs and has leveraged an additional $16 billion in private funding. We thought we’d add a local Pulaski angle so that we all understand what the ARC has done for Pulaski and the central role its funding and ability to leverage additional resources played in our local plans moving forward.

According to John White, Economic Development Director for the Town of Pulaski, “The loss of ARC funding will have a significant impact for Pulaski Town and County.” He said that ARC funds assisted in efforts here to get wireless internet access to the parts of the county that are still unserved – a task that White says continues. (More information on regional internet access here.)

“After the loss of smoke stack industries,” White says, “ARC helped fund planning for a new economic base, the results of which laid the foundation for an emphasis on developing an entrepreneurial culture, small business development, and the work that’s now underway with #Pulaskirising.”

Other small towns in southwest Virginia have used funding from ARC, along with the USDA Rural Development program and the Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), to revive their local economies. Towns like Big Stone Gap have used the combination of these public funds, along with significant private investment to begin economic revivals focusing on broad based development plans after the departure of smoke stack industries and mining (See page 8). As discussed in “Budget impact: Community Development Block Grants” these programs can provide funding for planning that is a requirement for local businesses to access low cost financing that make an enormous difference in their success. A good example of the combination funding is a USDA Rural Development/Town of Pulaski revolving loan fund for roof repair. In order to save the historic downtown buildings and retain the value of that unique asset, the Town and USDA have provided $150,000 to help repair roofs. Funding like this would be gone under the new budget, while the Town and local businesses would have to bear the full cost.

When asked about the likely impact of Trump’s proposed budget, White concluded, “The elimination of community development block grants and the ARC will be a serious blow to [Pulaski’s] addressing the economic changes and challenges.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Article by Mike Reis

Originally from NJ, now proud to call the mountains of Southwest Virginia home. Recovering lawyer, proud father of two, and husband. Give me a wave if you see me out on my bike.
Previous StoryBudget impact: Community Development Block Grants
Next Story3,000 Pulaski County residents to lose insurance coverage

Comments: 2 replies added

  1. Epictitus April 9, 2017 Reply

    Thank you for creating this forum. It is heartening to see motivated young people committed to making things better. I am concerned when words such as betrayal or punish are used to describe routine attempts to be more efficient and productive in constantly changing circumstances. Do we warrant punishment? Has there ever been a guarantee by the Feds that this program will last forever? I suggest that this action is not terrible or horrible or a dire emergency, but an unfortunate decision which may effect us in some way. It would be better if it did not occur, rather what can we do to deal with whatever negatives may exist for us?

  2. Eric Bucey April 22, 2017 Reply

    There was a related editorial in today's Roanoke Times that reinforces Mike's points. Read more at: http://www.roanoke.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-trump-s-budget-director-doesn-t-understand-the-appalachian/article_3c31fee6-8976-5e9a-bf25-fce15472c8d6.html. Donald Trump and his OMB Director are out of touch with the role government economic development efforts play in our rural communities. They naively believe that some arbitrary target of 3.5% national economic growth will suddenly fix our town's economic challenges. Eliminating economic simulators like the ARC, EDA, and CDBG does in fact punish Pulaski.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Search

Browse by Topic

Follow Peaksknob.net

Get our commentary, perspective, and hyper local stories delivered hot off the press to your inbox daily.

Trending

  • Confederate Monuments, Pulaski, and Unanswerable Questions
    Confederate Monuments, Pulaski, and Unanswerable Questions

Recent Stuff!

  • Who can represent the diverse landscape of the Ninth District? November 4, 2018
  • Hiding in the Opioid Numbers August 30, 2018
  • Finding Truth in Noah Thomas’s Death June 13, 2018
  • Primary Elections are tomorrow – Tuesday, June 12! June 11, 2018
  • Pulaski Explainer: Should Pulaski Join the Opioid Lawsuit? May 30, 2018

Like on Facebook

Like on Facebook

Get Updates

Follow on Twitter

My Tweets
Magazine WordPress Theme made by ThemeFuse
%d bloggers like this: